Home

John's Q&As

ConnectEd’s Gary Hoachlander on high schools of the future
 
 

Recent Videos

ConnectEd’...
Chuck Weis on la...
Ze’ev Wurm...
State Superinten...
More videos
 
 

Diane Ravitch’s conversion

Posted in Uncategorized

From neocon Irving Kristol to anti-communist crusader Whittaker Chambers, there’s been a history of true believers turned full-throated denouncers. Now, education has a celebrated convert, Diane Ravitch.

Before an approving audience of union teachers in San Jose on Saturday, the education historian , respected author and blogger (“Bridging Differences) denounced all of what she once believed in: pay for performance, the school accountability movement, standardized tests, public school choice.

The New York University education professor and fellow affiliated with the Hoover and Brookings institutions especially laid into her erstwhile allies: think tanks and foundations  that are “demonizing unions, scape-goating teachers and undermining education.”

Teachers, she said, need to stand up to the forces that are “steamrolling over American education,” led by President Obama, with his push for charters schools through the Race to the Top competition, which she calls “No Child Left Behind on steroids.”

“There has never been time when public education was in greater peril than today,” she said, lashing out at a takeover of public education by “private entrepreneurs, amateurs and profit-making businesses.”

The speech was a taste of “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education,” which will be released tomorrow. (Go here for a review of the book by education columnist Peter Schrag.)  It’s an unbridled retraction of beliefs.  But for all her over-the-top criticism of reformers, she offered on Saturday not a hint of criticism of her host – and defender of the status quo – the California Teachers Association.

Ravitch was an assistant secretary of education in the first Bush administration. When No Child Left Behind became law in 2002 under George W Bush, she joined the chorus advocating merit pay and standardized testing. “I thought NCLB was good idea and applauded it when it was enacted.”

But we’re now seeing that “choice and accountability are leading American education in the wrong direction, she said. “Just because something is called reform doesn’t mean it’s a good idea. Just because someone calls himself a reformer doesn’t mean he knows what he is talking about.”

Accountability gone awry

Accountability  became driving force, and American education became data-driven not mission driven. Instruction was suspended for weeks, if not longer, she said, to prepare for the all-important test. States lowered standards  to escape penalties, and districts narrowed their curricula to only what was tested. Scores on the nation’s report card, the National Assessment of Educational Progress or NAEP have stagnated – evidence that NCLB has failed, she said.

The Obama administration, recognizing problems of narrowed curriculum, is offering states and school districts hundreds of millions of dollars to design new assessments and is pressuring states to adopt common-core standards in math and English language arts. But Ravitch denounced Obama for standing behind charter schools and for advocating basing teacher pay on the results standardized tests.

She dismissed studies that showed charter schools outperform traditional schools, saying that charters enroll fewer handicapped and English learning students – “academic apartheid” for those left out. And tests, she said, should be used for diagnostic purposes and to evaluate programs – not against teachers and principals.

She denounced the president for saying he wants to close 5,000 of the worst performing schools. “Managing schools shouldn’t be treated like a stock portfolio,” she said. “It should be more like helping a family in trouble. Educational euthanasia is not a good idea.”

Obama and Duncan have actually given districts four options to turn around failing schools; closure is just one of the options – and the one least likely to happen.

When leaping from black to white,  greys — and sometimes facts — get in the way. That’s a problem with full, public conversions, in education, politics or religion.

Comments on Diane Ravitch’s conversion

Really this is very curious. Despite every calumny and lie, Diane Ravitch has never been an enemy of public schools or public education. She is and always has been a strong advocate of high standards, of AP testing, of strong curricula and of humane liberal learning. Diane has never been interesting in ideology but in seeking out what works. It is true that at one time she flirting with voucherism some years ago but she has always kept an open mind. She has never been a libertarian and has always been independent politically. Her new book is a great book and a truthful book that we could all learn from. As a classroom teacher I think her attack on the scientism of bubble tests is strong. I am not afriad of such tests -they tell us something. But they are not a valid instrument for English learners. They are a mere dipstick and narrow measure only. Only the classroom teacher knows the true progress of his or her students and then his or her supervisors, department chairs and administrators. Read Ravitch's book it is an eye opener.
- Richard Munro
The author of this opinion piece is the one who fails to see grey. In her book, Diane Ravitch criticizes reforms that she once advocated, but especially the reckless pursuit of such reforms. And she advocates for a strong and rich curriculum, as she has done for many years. This is the work of scholarship, experience, passion for education, and level-headed independent thought. As a teacher, I am troubled by the hasty embrace of value-added methodology--and policymakers' dismissal of questions and cricitism. Ravitch’s work gives me hope; it challenges me to deepen my understanding and speak my mind.
- Teacher
Ravitch's insights and shift in views are simply cluing in the clueless, and it’s time for them to take heed. It is very telling that such a remarkably intelligent, prominent, and wise person is now seeing things in such a different way -- especially a person who has spent a life learning about, and analyzing, US public education policy. It would only be smart for others to follow her advice and wisdom. To the current set of ed reformers, this will all be an emotional blow because they thought they were right to use their business model way. Their mode, however, happens to be ineffective when it comes to the nurturing and development of children’s minds. They don’t seem to fundamentally understand all that is involved with the effective rearing of children – but teachers do, and intimately. It is about building up, not tearing down. If the heart of the reformers is one which is truly interested in making improvements toward the education of this country’s children, they should all now go into seclusion with Ravitch’s book, where they will actively reconsider their views, then emerge and concede. If, instead, they chose to launch more aggressive attacks on teachers and public ed, then the mean and destructive ulterior motives behind today's branded "education reform" will become perfectly clear for all to see.
- Pondoora
Some quotes from Diane Ravitch's book: No Child Left Behind "was a punitive law based on erroneous assumptions about how to improve schools. It assume that reporting test scores to the public would be an effective lever for school reform. It assumed that changes in governance would lead to school improvement. It assumed that shaming schools that were unable to lift test scores every year -- and the people who work in them -- would lead to higher scores. It assumed that low scores are caused by lazy teachers and lazy principals, who need to be threatened with the loss of their jobs. Perhaps most naively, it assumed that higher test scores on standardized tests are synonymous with good education. Its assumptions were wrong. Testing is not a substitute for curriculum and instruction. Good education cannot be achieved by a strategy of testing children, shaming educators, and closing schools." -- pages 110-111 ... "...we must preserve American public education, because it is so intimately connected to our concepts of citizenship and democracy and to the promise of American life. In view of the money and power now arrayed on behalf of the ideas and programs that I will criticize [in the book], I hope it is not too late." -- page 14 ... Ravitch has immense credibility as a longtime insider in the "education reform" world, and it took integrity and courage for her to acknowledge reality and speak out. ... A few points in response to the post here on Educated Guess: Studies are mixed at best, and most appear to show that charters do not outperform public schools. Ravitch's discussion addresses the issue of those perenially mixed results. In any case, one of her points (I'm most of the way through her book, which I had preordered and received last week) is that the "we're gonna crush 'em" hostility displayed by so many charter advocates against public schools is harmful and a destructive perversion of the original vision of the charter movement. ... She is clear that the mistaken and harmful education policies of the Obama administration give four options for "failing" schools, so the implication that she's not aware of that or doesn't discuss it is inaccurate. ... It's evident why education commentators -- especially those who remain at a remote distance from messy, unpredictable, illusion-shattering real-life kids and classrooms -- would be stung by Ravitch's book. But ethical, thoughtful people should be paying close attention.
- carolineSF
 
Return to Home page

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Get updates of The Educated Guess

Enter your email address:

 

About The Educated Guess

The Educated Guess is a forum on education policies in California and Silicon Valley. It is funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and sponsored by the Silicon Valley E
Read more
 

About John

John Fensterwald is a journalist at the Silicon Valley Education Foundation,
which he joined in September 2009. For 11 years before that, he wrote editorials at the Mercury News in San Jose, with a focus on education.
Read more
 

Recent Posts

 

Archives

 

Categories

 

Other Links

  • Bridging Differences Diane Ravitch and Deborah Meyer, opposites on some issue, share an insightful dialogue.
  • California Progress Report Check out author and retired newspaper editor Peter Schrag’s column every Monday.
  • California Teachers Association The teachers union’s perspective on ed reform and issues affecting teachers
  • EdSource Prime site for facts and research on education in California.
  • Education Next Online journal and blogs sponsored by Hoover Institution’s Koret Task Force on K-12 Education
  • Edutopia “What works in public education. Funded by The George Lucas Educational Foundation
  • Eduwonk Blog by Andrew Rotherham, co-founder and Publisher of Education Sector, keeps sharp eye on national scene.
  • EdVoice Small advocacy group that’s a power behind the scenes in Sacramento.
  • Enterprise Blog Andrew Smarick keeps a close eye on federal spending. He writes for the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
  • Getting Down To Facts studies 20 studies on school governance and finance; published in 2007. Encyclopedic and relevant.
  • Governor’s Committee on Education Excellence 2007 report with recommendations the governor shouldn’t have ignored.
  • Joanne Jacobs Former colleage at the Mercury News challenges assumptions with incisive writing.
  • Learning Matters John Merrow, PBS’ education correspondent
  • The College Puzzle Stanford Professor Emeritus of Education and Business Administration Michael Kirst explores policy issues relating to the preparation for and success in college.